Aside of the obvious difference that this is Minnesota and our tournament is in Texas (which is neither governed by Minnesota law nor by a former "wrestler"), it seems that the snag here was that the place made money off of it. Not directly, it seems. Rather, it is implied that the tournament generates customers that in turn pay for bowling or beer or otherwise add to the profits of the place.
What I find interesting in the article is that there is no debate over the "game of skill" versus game of luck. If and when courts decide that it is a game of skill, I think almost all state laws, including alcohol codes, will no longer apply. After all, winning money at golf is legal.
One snag that would however remain in some states is the language in the laws refering specifically to games involving cards and dice.
Random thoughts from a lawyer, an accountant, a commodities trader, an ex-Marine and a WSOP Main Event money finisher that don't know as much as they wish they did...