Saturday, May 07, 2005


Posted by Dr Fro 3:03 PM
I always find this situation annoying:



You know there is a decent chance that he doesn't have that good of a hand. This is Party Poker. But it is really tempting. If he doesn't have an over pair (say he holds AK, AQ, 88) you are the favorite. I see people bet hands like that all the time. But I think the better long term play is to fold. If they were on a steal, I think it encourages them to try to steal again. Next time you call with a better hand. If they were betting AA, KK, etc, then it teaches them to slow down and the next time it is cheaper for you to see if you can flop trips.



You know that it is a bad play on their part. It is a -EV play. Anytime EV is given up by a player, an equaly and opposite amount of EV is picked up by the remaining players. It is hard to see in this situation how I am better off, but I think it must come down to the (rare) situation that somebody overbets the pot and you happen to be holding AA.

Thoughts?


3 Comment(s):

Posted by Blogger Patrick, at 11:48 PM, May 07, 2005  

Well, you're in for $9 and you're holding nines. That's an omen, isn't it? I'd call.

Kidding...



__________________________________________________

Posted by Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:08 AM, May 08, 2005  

Is it always a bad play on their part? Is it always negative EV?

Harrington on Holdem, p. 206, describes this as a squeeze play. It's pressure stems from not only the reraise, but that you have someone yet to act who smooth called your initial raise to begin with - the sandwich effect.

Let's assume the reraiser wasn't trapping with AA or KK. Let's assume he has gone all in with AK. Meaning there are only 3 AA hands and 3 KK hands possible. Let's also assume that two-thirds of the time he pulls this trick, everyone folds.

So, two thirds of the time, he wins $20 ($9 + $9 + blinds = fold equity). The other 1/3 the time, he gets called. Let's assume he gets called by AK, AA-TT. What is his EV when called?

v. 3 AA hands - 9:1 dog
v. 3 KK hands - 3:1 dog
v. 18 QQ-TT hands - 11:10 dog
v. 9 AK hands - Even money

So, 27/33 of the time when he gets called, his EV is about 0 (ie he will put $79 in and get $79 back, on average).

Vs 3 KK hands, his EV is -$36 (25% of $170 pot - $79), and vs 3 AA his EV is -$62 (10% of $170 pot - $79).

66 * 20 = 1320
27 * 0 = 0
3 * -36 = -108
3 * -62 = -186

For every 99 squeeze plays with AK under the assumptions above, he makes $1026, or $10.30 per hand. That's positive EV.

Clearly, the worse hand you try a squeeze play with, the lower your EV when called. But there has to be a considerable range of hands beyond AK where this play is profitable because of the huge fold equity. This is particularly true in tournaments, where if you call with 99 and misjudge it (or he draws out), you are gone.

In your specific hand, unless you had a great read on the guy, I'd lay down the nines. Most likely, you are either a small favorite (v overcards) or a big dog (v. overpair). While there is a chance he has an underpair, you can find better spots to get your money all in preflop.



__________________________________________________

Posted by Blogger Dr Fro, at 5:05 PM, May 08, 2005  

Thanks, binion.

First of all, you said, "Most likely, you are either a small favorite (v overcards) or a big dog (v. overpair). "

Right, so I folded.

Regarding everything in your analysis, I agree, but I think I need to clarify what I said when I said "-EV"...

Let's say you are faced with a range of options A-E with the following EVs:

A +10
B +5
C +3
D -2
E -5

You lose EV by opting for options B-E. If you choose option B, yes, you have positive expecation for the hand, but you gave up some EV for no good reason.

In relation to this particular hand, I think you clearly demonstrated that he can stand to profit on this move he made. And I agree. Not withstanding the need to vary your play, I believe there is a more profitable way to play this same hand. If I had AK in that postion, I probably would raise to about $30, which would have many effects, two of which are:

1) It is a better squeeze play. Now the guy with 99 is even more likely to fold. The $75 bet has him nearly all in anyway, but the $30 bet makes the re-raise scarier.

2) It gives Mr AK more room to run for the hills if an AA or KK re-raises him.

In summary, I agree that he stands to win more than he loses on that hand by playing the way he did, but unless he plays every hand trying to extract the maximum possible EV, he may have an overall -EV for his total portfolio of decisions.

Anyway, I appreciate your thoughts, esp the Harrington angle.



__________________________________________________



Post a Comment




Google

Random thoughts from a lawyer, an accountant, a commodities trader, an ex-Marine and a WSOP Main Event money finisher that don't know as much as they wish they did...

--------------------

--------------------

Home Page

Email

Johnnymac-at-itaintgambling.com

What's this all about? Poker. Why we like poker. What we have to say about poker. How we play poker.

Why isn't it gambling?

ARCHIVE:

current
09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008
01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008
02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008
03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008
04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008
05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008
06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008
09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008
11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008
12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009
01/01/2009 - 02/01/2009
02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009
03/01/2009 - 04/01/2009

The Doctor is IN

Dr Fro
aka "slow roller"

Which one is the fish?

Junell
aka "Sunday Stroller"

You go now!

Johnny Mac
aka "Chop Suey"

You got to know when to hold em;  Know when to Mo' em ...

Morris
aka "Mo roller"

Old School

Padilla
"Baby's Daddy"


free hit counter

QUICKGIFTS

Beautiful handmade receiving blankets. Get yours today in flannel or seersucker.

Get Flash


I play poker at Poker.com