Saturday, June 18, 2005


Posted by Dr Fro 3:22 PM
I promised a post about middle-ish pairs getting re-raised, inspired by a hand against Adam. The facts below have been changed from what happened a week ago, but the conclusion is the same.

Assume everyone starts with $300.
Adam has 99 UTG
BB=$2, SB =$1.
He raises to $12 and gets re-raised to $75, so it is $63 to call.

He has 3 options:

Option 1: Fold
Since all money invested so far is a sunk cost, the EV of this option is exactly $0.

Option 2: Call
This is a bad option and I will first say that the reason why is the best case scenario is to be about a coin toss. Several possible hands are huge favortites. I seriously doubt A9 or 88 or lower would be making this move.

The math:
Assuming the only hands to re-raise here are AA, KK, QQ, JJ, TT, AK, AQ, AJ (see footnote below). The first 4 can be made in 6 possible ways making 24 hands. The last 3 hands can be made 16 ways for 48 possible hands. So 24/72 hands dominate you (19% chance of Adam winning) and 48/72 hands are a coin flip (52% chance of Adam winning).
52%*$90 + 48%*(-$63) * 48/72 +
19%*$90 + 81%*(-$63) * 24/72
= an EV of -$0.27.

Of course, that is all pot odds, not implied odds, which are much more difficult to calculate. The fact that Adam is out of position only hurts the case for calling. So far, folding looks better than calling. What about a raise?

Option 3: Raise
First assume he pushes all in for $288 and gets a call. The math is:
52%*$315 + 48%*(-$288) * 48/72 +
19%*$315 + 81%*(-$288) * 24/72
= an EV of -$40.77.

That doesn't sound very good. Ahhh, but what if Adam's opponent folds, giving Adam fold equity? He wins $90.

Now if Adam thinks that he will get a fold 31% of the time, this is a break even proposition. It seems to me quite reasonable that he would get a fold > 31% of the time. Maybe only AA, KK, QQ call...that would mean 75% of the hands would fold. Even if his opponent is quite loose, it still seems pretty reasonable to expect him to fold more than 31% of the time.

Conclusion:
Don't call. Fold or Re-raise all-in. Adam was probably right to not re-raise me because I am known to stand my ground (to a fault) and thus he may think he gets a fold < 31% of the time.

Footnote:
I know people will take all sorts of exceptions to the above analysis, including the range of hands I selected. However, 2 points should be noted: 1) The above assumptions are consistent with the play in the games in which I play and 2) tweaking the assumptions doesn't change the main conclusion that calling is wrong, wrong, wrong.

4 Comment(s):

Posted by Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:21 PM, June 19, 2005  

I like your thought process Fro.

One correction and one observation.

First, the correction: there are 30 possible overpair hands out - (AA, KK, QQ, JJ, TT) * 6 = 30 not 24.

This changes the rest of the calculations, which result in a 37% fold rate necessary to make reraising all-in +EV compared to folding:

Call EV
19% * 603 * 30/78 +
52% * 603 * 48/78 = $237.03 average stack if you go all in and Villain calls.

Stack if you go all in and Villain folds = $378

37% * 378 + 63% * 237.03 = $289.19, which is $1.19 +EV compared to folding (which results in stack of $288).

So, Villain needs to fold at least 37% of the time to make pushing +EV. If Villain will call with AA, KK and AK, then that's 28/78 hands, or 36%. Very close call.

Now the observation: calling out of position with the intent of going all in on the flop no matter what is an option. It's called a "stop and go" play, coined by Greg Raymer, and it's not always "wrong, wrong, wrong."

It works better than pushing preflop when your stack is smaller and you don't have ANY fold equity by pushing all-in preflop. In this case, for example if your stack was $150 and facing a $75 bet, a stop and go would be a much better play than pushing all-in, because Villain won't fold anything getting 3:1 preflop.

The stop and go creates fold equity on the flop when you have the best hand (ie 99 v AK and no A or K flops), and when a scare card hits (ie 99 v. JJ but an Ace flops).

Binions



__________________________________________________

Posted by Blogger Dr Fro, at 3:13 PM, June 19, 2005  

Thanks for the correction...

FWIW, I originally did the calc on TT (which is what Adam told me later that he held) which gives you 24 higher pairs. I forgot to change that part of the math.

It seems that Stop and Go increases the chance of getting the fold you would like and for less money. I'll look into it...



__________________________________________________

Posted by Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:44 AM, June 20, 2005  

Well said, Morris.

I didn't challenge the assumptions of hand range, because Fro said not to for the purpose of the math exercise.

I will say that you are either going to be a small favorite (v. overcards) or a big dog (v. overpair) to the $75 raiser, and that's generally a situation you want to avoid.



__________________________________________________

Posted by Blogger Dr Fro, at 11:03 AM, June 20, 2005  

Thus, Adam was right to fold.

A bit of game theory:

I knew my reraise indicated more strenght than I actually had. I figured Adam would be smart enough to fold, which is the biggest reason I reraised. To a more foolish player, I would maybe not reraise.

If he called, I am 50/50, with position. Not bad for me.

If he reraised, then I figure he is only holding AA, KK. An easy fold for me.



__________________________________________________



Post a Comment




Google

Random thoughts from a lawyer, an accountant, a commodities trader, an ex-Marine and a WSOP Main Event money finisher that don't know as much as they wish they did...

--------------------

--------------------

Home Page

Email

Johnnymac-at-itaintgambling.com

What's this all about? Poker. Why we like poker. What we have to say about poker. How we play poker.

Why isn't it gambling?

ARCHIVE:

current
09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008
01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008
02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008
03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008
04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008
05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008
06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008
09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008
11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008
12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009
01/01/2009 - 02/01/2009
02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009
03/01/2009 - 04/01/2009

The Doctor is IN

Dr Fro
aka "slow roller"

Which one is the fish?

Junell
aka "Sunday Stroller"

You go now!

Johnny Mac
aka "Chop Suey"

You got to know when to hold em;  Know when to Mo' em ...

Morris
aka "Mo roller"

Old School

Padilla
"Baby's Daddy"


free hit counter

QUICKGIFTS

Beautiful handmade receiving blankets. Get yours today in flannel or seersucker.

Get Flash


I play poker at Poker.com