It's PricewaterhouseCoopers, not Price Waterhouse Cooper. Either way, I am glad to see the results of their study. Of course, facts and good rationale have little to do with public policy, so I don't expect any thing to change.
I have been enjoying Pokerstars, but maybe I should give Absolute Poker a stab...
I never understood why you PWC guys get so upset over the way people say/spell the company name? Is that something they teach you in orientation?
I deposed a guy from PWC awhile back and I kept referring to it as PriceWaterhouse (leaving off the "Coopers"). You would've thought I called his mother a whore. Everytime I said it, he would correct me by saying, "the name is PriceWaterhouse Coopers."
BFD!
A fellow blogger worked at Reliant. You don't have to say he worked at Reliant Energy Corporation. It's just Reliant.
Price Waterhouse merged with Coopers and Lybrand to for PwC.
The C&L guys had a bit of inferiority complex and went apeshit over the initial proposal for the name of the merged firm ("Price Waterhouse"). A lot of time and money was spent before the partners settled on PwC. This appeased the guys that came from "C"
The partner you deposed in Houston was from C&L, thus he is particularly sensitive that the "C" part of "PwC" doesn't disappear.
Personally, I call it PW sometimes just to get a rise out of the "C" folk.
CCM is from Coopers because he wasn't smart enough to get an internship with PW.
Random thoughts from a lawyer, an accountant, a commodities trader, an ex-Marine and a WSOP Main Event money finisher that don't know as much as they wish they did...